Archive for the Category »In the News «

Stop killing our daughters

I need to echo this post by Sylvia regarding the Hope Witsell suicide and how we treat “sluts” in our society. Hope Witsell, a 13 year old girl, sent a phone picture of her naked breast to a guy she liked. It got spread across her school and neighbouring schools. She was punished by her school, her parents and ridiculed by her peers. She hanged herself in her room with a pink scarf.

Of course it wasn’t a slut-shaming, woman-hating, sex-hating culture that divides young women into “good” (virginal) and “bad” (fallen) and allowed a 13-year-old girl to believe that she had ruined her life forever by showing a boy her tits.

No, it was her “impetuous move” and somehow also the dangers of the INTERNET (even though the internet was not involved, except in that her internet access, probably one of her major sources of social support, was taken away by her “churchgoing family” as a punishment for an act that they had no goddamn fucking idea what it even was or what technology it used).

Huffington Post also has a very good article on this issue.

As the sad, sad story of Hope Witsell shows, there shouldn’t be any distinction made between those who deserve a bad reputation and those who don’t. No girl deserves to be called a “slut.” After all, when was the last time a sexually active boy was punished by his school or harassed by his peers? Dividing “sluts” into the innocent and guilty reinforces the idea that male sexuality is normal while female sexuality is deviant at worst, defiant at best. Look what happens when this thinking is taken to its extreme.

I couldn’t agree more. I myself was bullied badly at my school because I’d had the nerve to have a private discussion with a friend regarding masturbation, and admitted that I in fact had done it. I had guys shouting insults with regards to my sexuality after me on a daily basis for three years. I tried refusing to go to school but my mother wouldn’t allow it.

Was it stupid of me to trust another person with something so private? It would appear so. It didn’t even occurr to me that talking about masturbation would cause me years of grief and torment, and why would it? Thankfully, I was raised by a smart and supportive woman who told me that there was nothing wrong with me. What I had admitted to was a natural thing, and nothing to be ashamed of. I dread to think how I’d managed to get through those three years in that school if my mother had been a less open minded person.

I love you, mom.

Incredible timing, Mr Brown

It’s as if he’s been reading my mind – or my blog. Or maybe times really are changing in this country.

Gordon Brown is expected to announce mothers will be entitled to divide some of their year’s leave with their husbands after a period of six months.

The scheme is due to come into force in April 2010.

Mothers are presently allowed 12 months’ maternity leave, with guaranteed pay for nine of them.

But business groups said the plan will place a greater burden on already-stuggling employers.

They fear administration difficulties if husbands claim up to three month’s free pay.

The Daily Mail’s economics correspondent Sam Fleming told Sky News: “This plan makes sense in terms of lifestyle flexibility, but will be of little benefit to the economy.”

The policy is likely to be cheered rather than jeered by the unions though.

Fathers can currently claim up to two weeks of paternity leave.

Source

This made my morning. I hope it happens – it’s about time. Go Paternity leave!!

Sexism – still alive and well in the UK.

A study “revealing” that Britain is a ‘culturally sexist’ country that has failed to accept that women are equal to men is making the rounds in the news today. This is not shocking news to say the least, especially when it comes to City workers. If you’re a woman in the city, you make less money in salary, and in bonus. And no wonder, because this is not a culture that’s at all geared towards the family.
Here, have a sample comment from the daily mail article.

I don’t see any evidnce in this article that the report quoted actually compared like with like. I.e. men & women in the same jobs with the same level of experience.
If anyone (man or woman) chooses to take a career break of 1 – 5 years, (whether it’s to have a child or sail round the world) they cannot expect to return to work on the same standing as their colleague who worked all that time.

If you go on maternity leave in Norway – you can. You are expected to come back, and jobs are frequently offered as short term to cover maternity leave. As far as I am aware (Norwegian friends with kids may correct me) – this is not considered a problem. Norway is geared more towards the family – people go to work early in the morning and leave before 5pm.

I grew up with a single mother who had to work really hard to care for two small kids and make a living. And yet we managed to have dinner at 5pm most days when I grew up. Me? I usually have dinner closer to 8pm these days as both the taller half and myself tend to come home after 6 or 7. That’s just how it is over here, it’s geared towards work, and it’s geared towards men – or rather, men who do not care to be an equal part of the family. What if the father could take a few months of paternity leave and the mother goes back to work? That is not only a good idea in Norway, it actually happens very frequently. Here in the UK, the idea in itself is just silly.

My friend pc put it really well recently. He works for a Norwegian company in the UK, and a conference call was planned between his company and the CFO at a large Norwegian group of some sort. It was scheduled for 4pm, but got cancelled at the last minute because the CFO had to go pick up his kids at day care. Can you even imagine this happening in the UK, with a CFO for a large business? I sure can’t. The wife would have to go, of course.

I resent that it’s expected of me to at one point be fine with having my career slip away from me, just because I’m a woman. If we want to have children, that’s how it’ll be. No matter how we decide to try to make it work, having kids will more drastically affect my life than the life of my boyfriend, whose life will not be expected to change that much, especially not when it comes to work.

I’ve heard companies boast about their work/life flexibility here in the UK, but it won’t help until society itself is friendly towards family and accept not only that women want to work, but that both the man and the woman are parents. I am offended on the behalf of the men I know who have kids and aren’t able to take a more active role in the lives of their kids due to work demands.

I know, I know. “You choose to work there”.  It’s a piss-poor excuse in my opinion. It’s too easy to say “that’s just the way it is”, when it’s been proven in other countries that it doesn’t have to be that way. I may not want to move back to Norway, but I can’t lie – life is better in Norway. Yes, it’s taxed to hell, but there’s a different attitude towards work and family. If I could change one thing in the UK to be more like Norway, this would be it. I want a society that is more flexible towards families with small children. I want a society where being a woman is fine. I want a society where I don’t have to wear a skirt and high heels in order to be seen as a professional.

But let’s look away from equality, or feminism, or whatever you want to call it and see this from another side, one that might work better for those who see maternity leave as a bad thing. As a society, we want children, don’t we? We want smart, professional and capable people to have children so that future generations can benefit from their good genes. We need to maintain the population. I don’t think punishing people for having children is the right way to go. Why not encourage people to have children, keep in touch during the maternity and paternity leave, and welcome them back with open arms at the end of the leave rather than not expect them to come back? Give both men and women the same amount of leave when a child is born. That’s not feminism – that’s equality. That’s what I want.

Forgive my ranting ways, but I am so frustrated with this particular issue because I am who I am – a 31 year old woman who wants a solid and long career more than anything but also might want to have children one day. And I do so resent that I might have to choose between the two, just because I’m born with the appropriate bits for carrying a growing seed. I didn’t ask to be born a woman, but here I am.

I welcome discussion on this issue but please keep comments civil and think before you press the comment button. This is an issue it’s easy to have strong gut reactions to, but I don’t find that sort of comment very useful or interesting.

The death of Michael Jackson

I’ve been struggling for days trying to wrap my head around my reaction to the death of Michael Jackson. I was a fan from an early age, and as a child of the 80s that I am, MTV and Jackson’s music and videos is a large part of the soundtrack and visual imagery of my early life. Yes, there are some parts of Jackson’s personal life that is very troubling, but at the end of the day we don’t know what happened – so I’m not going to talk about that, enough people are covering this topic already.

I studied musicology in university and specialised in popular music at postgrad level and that of course colours my view of Jackson greatly – musically, Jackson is one of the most important artists of his generation, who heavily influenced the direction of pop music. This is not opinion – this is fact, and it has infuriated me to see several people saying that his music was not ground breaking – when it was.

Let’s side-step the massive issue I have with people who did not spend years and years analysing and reading academic texts on popular music effectively telling me they know my subject matter better than me (on what basis? news articles? please.) and instead refer onwards to someone who has articulated this very well already. I will quote a section of the blog post linked at the end of the entry, but I do encourage you to read the full entry and listen to the demos – it’s very interesting.

Rest in peace, Michael Jackson. Your music had a tremendous effect on me and a lot of others with me, and pop music lost one of its greatest artists last week.

As far as Thriller specifically…Mike did something that no one else had done….he created the musical bridge for mainstream music from the 70’s to the 80’s…he was the cat who survived the 70’s and led the way to he 80’s, where most other 70’s cats were tryna figure out what to do next…most of them were doing disco knock-offs and praying for their survival…

people glaze over it now…but what soul/R&B figure could create a hit rock record that was embraced across the board…AND considered authentic by the rock audience?(the snobs may have been pissed off, but they werent the ones buying the records)…what soul/R&B cat was collaborating with Van Halen….and have it WORK?

it wasnt Prince….w/out Beat It, could you have a Let’s Go Crazy?

what other soul/R&B cat could get one of the Beatles on Black radio in the 80’s?

what soul/R&B cat would get Vincent Price to drop spoken word in the middle a funk/R&B cut cum horror movie?

who was else at the time was incorporating African chants and percussion at a time when everyone was whitening it up sonically(including MJ)…and who would reference Soul Makossa in the 80’s?

listen to the fact that a Black artist who was considered strictly soul/R&B decided to do a stylistic tour de force in one album when it hadnt been done before…

Thriller had:
Funk
straight R&B
Quiet Storm
MOR Pop
Rock

…all in one album by a Black aritst when such a thing was not only unheard of but frowned upon…..

futhermore, on Thriller he spoke abt teen preganancy, gang violence, challenging the social constructs of manhood, the culture of gossip, emotional blackmail, obsession, false accusations of paternity, and belief in one’s self…

fluff?

In Memoriam Part 1: The Artistic Value of Thriller | Scorpeze explains it all….

Ryanair – “We will charge for the loo”

Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary defends plans for pay-per-loo fee | Business | The Guardian.

Not a publicity stunt after all. “Best” quotes:

O’Leary confirmed that he will ask Boeing to look at putting credit card readers on toilet locks for new aircraft.

Oh God, I can just imagine the credit card fee they will charge for that, the bastards. They already charge a fee of £5 per flight, per person, for payments by credit or debit card.  And currently you have to pay £10 per flight for luggage, and if you were unfortunate with your internet access and had to check in at the airport, that’s another £20. But after October 1, you can’t check-in at the airport at all, apparently! I have no idea how that’ll work.  (Source for fees: Ryanair website.)

O’Leary added that Boeing’s research department would now be able to work on the toilet concept because “war in Iraq and Afghanistan is winding down”.

Ugh. I mean it this time. I don’t care how cheap Ryanair is, this sort of crap is not worth it. And with the added fees, you’ll find yourself paying an extra £30 for every flight anyway if you have luggage, so what’s the point? It’s not even cheap anymore.

Oh hang on, just check-in costs £5. And the payment handling fee is £5. And the checked baggage fee is £10. That’s per person, per flight. £40 just in fees! So much for being a cheap airline, you blood-sucking bastards.

Susan Boyle at Britains Got Talent 2009

This has been making the rounds lately, and with good reason. You look at this woman, and you make up your mind about her.. and then she starts to sing. What a voice! I don’t even watch this show, and I want her to win.

ETA: Can’t embed this video, so click the YouTube link instead. YouTube – Susan Boyle – Singer – Britains Got Talent 2009 (With Lyrics).

Amazon calls mistake ‘embarrassing and ham-fisted’

Amazon calls mistake ‘embarrassing and ham-fisted’.

This is an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error for a company that prides itself on offering complete selection.

It has been misreported that the issue was limited to Gay & Lesbian themed titles – in fact, it impacted 57,310 books in a number of broad categories such as Health, Mind & Body, Reproductive & Sexual Medicine, and Erotica. This problem impacted books not just in the United States but globally. It affected not just sales rank but also had the effect of removing the books from Amazon’s main product search.

Many books have now been fixed and we’re in the process of fixing the remainder as quickly as possible, and we intend to implement new measures to make this kind of accident less likely to occur in the future.

More on what happened here. I’m glad they’re embarrassed – they should be! One French employee can mess up an entire site by flicking a switch? Perhaps they should look at their QA processes more closely.

Amazon discriminating against LGBT and feminist literature

Amazon has made a decision to strip the sales rank of LGBT books, so that they won’t appear on best seller lists. Vixialicious on Livejournal’s post on the subject is much better than anything I could’ve said.

It’s not pornography, it’s not erotica they’re going after. It’s all LGBT literature. Looking for a list of the best college guides out there? Well, the one put out by the Advocate won’t be on there. How about a list of the best Young Adult series? Well, you aren’t going to find Rainbow Road, no matter how many copies have been sold.

If they are looking to truly remove ‘adult materials’ from their search lists, why are the novels depicting graphic heterosexual sex still there? What criteria have they applied to determine what should be labeled ‘adult?’

And most importantly, WHO ELECTED AMAZON TO BE THE MORALITY POLICE?

Epic Fail, Amazon. I’m a very regular customer, but you’re on notice and am not getting any more of my money. And to do my part in the Google bombing, here’s a link to the Smart Bitches Trashy Books page for Amazon Rank.

Here’s the top hits on ‘homosexuality’ in amazon.com right now:

  1. A Parent’s Guide to Preventing Homosexuality
  2. Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, Revised and Expanded Edition.
  3. For the Bible Tells me So
  4. Can Homosexuality be healed?

And the same search on amazon.co.uk:

  1. Can Homosexuality be healed?
  2. A Parent’s Guide to Preventing Homosexuality
  3. Stories from the War on Homosexuality [DVD]
  4. homosexuality is fun Decorated Mouse Pad
  5. Immorality in the Church: Homosexuality [CASSETTE]

And so on and so forth. Are you KIDDING ME? I have no words angry enough for this.

Category: In the News  7 Comments
Italy Earthquake Appeal | British Red Cross

In the early hours of 6 April 2009, a powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 6.3 on the Richter scale struck the city of L’Aquila in central Italy, 120 km northeast of Rome.According to the Italian Red Cross at least 260 people are dead, 1,000 injured and 30 missing. The quake has left around 28,000 people homeless in the city, which has a population of 70,000.

It is critical that these people, many of whom have lost everything, get shelter, food and water.

We need to act now.
The Italian Red Cross is already responding with health, first aid, logistics and humanitarian relief. It has also established a field hospital to relieve the burden on local health facilities, which are under enormous strain, and set up mobile kitchens able to provide 10,000 meals a day. But more funds are urgently required to make sure everyone gets the help they need.

A small donation goes a long way. Even the value of a small Easter egg will help someone who has lost everything. Just think about it, and give if you can.

Italy Earthquake Appeal | British Red Cross.

Oh, media. (Stephen Fry and Jade Goody)

I’ve seen several publications and blogs today saying that Stephen Fry compared Jade Goody to Lady Di. There’s a slight problem with this, as he didn’t actually really quite say what he’s being credited for saying.

Here’s his three “tweets” on the subject:

Poor, dear Jade. She was a fellow guest on @wossy a year or so back & I warmed to her immensely. All impulsive spirit & smiles. What a life #

Jade lived life under a magnifiyong glass. Magnifying glasses magnify (obviously) but they distort and they burn. #

I suppse she was a kind of Princess D from the wrong side of the tracks…. #

I haven’t seen a single report that includes the second tweet, which puts the third in context. The comparison as I read it yesterday (and still do) is that they both lived under media scrutiny in life and death – and that he liked her when he met her. That’s it. He did in no way compare Goody raising the profile for cervical cancer to Princess Diana’s amazing record of humanitarian work. He did not hold Jade Goody up to the standard of Diana. He compared media scrutiny, and they sure both had a lot of that. That Goody welcomed the attention is beside the point.

The media loves to take small soundbites out of context for great effect. I shouldn’t be surprised that out of what he said, that’s what they latched onto. Oh, media. Shut up. And while we’re at it, stop quoting anyone’s Twitter. Call them or contact them via their agents or however this malarkey works, but do actual journalism, please. I know that’s a lot to ask – it takes actual work, after all – but please move on to the next media thing to obsess with and leave Twitter to the geeks.